Fuck if I know. This tumblr is an assortment of sporadic posts ranging from discussions of my academic interests (major in Philosophy, minor in Anthropology, and another in LGBT/Gender Studies), to personal posts, fawning over celebrity crushes like Jon Stewart, Ryan Gosling, Jason Segel, NPH, etc. Shows like Doctor Who, Sherlock, HIMYM, and others. Basically it is anyone's guess. If you are brave enough to follow me, maybe send a message or two, I will love you 5ever and bake you wonderful treats.
dudeistlibertarian (via dudeistlibertarian)
"don’t take my stuff, or I’ll shoot you". because property rights > right to life. quality stuff right here, real solid.
… people around the world continue to be harassed, discriminated against, abused and even murdered simply because their personality and character contradict gender and sexuality-based stereotypes, and the way modern feminism glorifies one gender at the expense of another, feeds into that cycle of hate and violence.
Is this a joke? The main reason that people are “harassed, discriminated against, abused and even murdered simply because their personality and character contradict the gender and sexuality-based stereotypes” is because of gender-roles firmly held in the patriarchy. A male who is “effeminate” is seen as “weak”, hence weakness is associated with males being called “pussies”. That is the first flaw with this post. Second, it mischaracterizes and generalizes that all of feminism and all feminists are about “glorifying” women “at the expense of another”. Feminism in most instances and as most would agree is about equality. When wages are lower for the same amount of work for women it is about equality. When men can talk about their sexual exploits and not be slut-shamed but a woman’s sexuality is condemned it is about equality. This post twists a serious and legitimate issue as a means of belittling and demonizing another legitimate issue. What a fucking joke.
Me: You want to write my paper for me?
Friend: I can't! I DON'T EVEN HAVE HANDS! *waves hands hidden underneath sleeves*
Get it right!
Funny story, South Carolina (the first state to secede from the Union) in their Declaration of Secession stated the following as reasons for leaving the US:
"The Constitution of the United States, in its fourth Article, provides as follows: ‘No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.’ This stipulation was so material to the compact, that without it that compact would not have been made. The greater number of the contracting parties held slaves….”
"But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution.”
"…the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress.”
"Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery…”
"…the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that ‘Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free,’ and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.”
If the cause was “Northern Aggression” it was aggression towards the institution of slavery. And I doubt even you would argue the institution of slavery needed protection from aggression.
Well, according to the bible, you shouldn’t have been touching the skin of a pig anyway.
I guess the stain is your punishment. You must live with it.
Who takes the bible THAT literally anyway?
#thatawkwardmomentwhen a religious person who adheres to biblical condemnation of homosexuals and believes they love in sin and are going to hell asks “who takes the bible that literally anyway?” "Who takes the bible THAT literally anyway?" Don’t pick and choose religious doctrine and dogma to apply when it fits your agenda and disregard the rest. The bible may have parts that are allegorical or supposed to be more symbolic but the laws are the laws. Certain crops, materials, foods, and behaviors are off-limits while the same section that condemns homosexuality allows slavery. So, stop using religion to justify your bigotry.
so last night I tried (and failed miserably) to go to sleep at a reasonable time. tried to stay off the internet to do it, but when I finally stopped reading and writing at about 3/3:30, I fell asleep HARD. Then at 7:40 I am woken up by my roommate’s four friends freshly stumbled home from the bar. They are recounting their evenings drunkenly and loudly and generally just being bad guests (left the front door wide open for GOD knows how long, among other things). But after I left my room to “go to the bathroom”, since my room is literally right outside where they are they asked if they were being too loud I said it did wake me up. they proceed to drunkenly whisper (so not even whisper) for about five minutes before they get loud again. Thanks for trying drunken jackasses.
Not that anyone probably cares so… HAVE SOME (relevant) GIFS!
I’m going to refer to your penis as a dongle from now on, that is all. No opinion. Except totes the Egyptian mummy
First question would be… how often will we be referring to my penis anyway? Second is how in the great name of golly did you decide on “dongle”?
and yeah man, that mummy was asking for it. I was just giving it what it has wanted for thousands of years. I mean… what?